Results

Back

Average per year over 10 simulated years

Hiring outcomes under baseline and questionnaire cases

Per simulated year
63 positions 300 candidates
Market size held fixed across both scenarios.
Without questionnaire 24 matches
39 searches unfilled 276 candidates unmatched
With questionnaire 38 matches
25 searches unfilled 262 candidates unmatched

Figures

The figures below trace outcomes across participation rates ρ ∈ {0%, 5%, 20%, 50%, 90%, 100%}.

Click any figure to expand

Candidate welfare and matching rate by participation status.
Participation effects Candidate outcomes by participation status. Left: Mean welfare. Right: Matching rate.
Aggregate candidate welfare across participation rates. Candidate welfare by quality tier across participation rates.
Candidate-side gains Mean candidate welfare by ρ. Left: Total candidate pool. Right: By quality tier: gains persist across all tiers.
Matched candidate utility by quality tier and participation rate. Department welfare per hiring position by prestige tier and participation rate.
Distributional effects Outcomes by tier and ρ. Left: Mean candidate utility among matched, by quality tier. Right: Department welfare per position, by prestige tier.
Interview allocation heatmap by department and candidate tier. Hiring distribution heatmap by department and candidate tier.
Allocation shift Left: Interview and Right: hiring allocations rebalance under structured signaling.
Department position outcomes under baseline and full participation. Candidate hire outcomes under baseline and full participation.
Outcome composition Left: Department position outcomes: initial-offer fills, scramble fills, and unfilled positions. Right: Candidate hire outcomes: matched vs. unmatched. Both panels compare baseline (ρ = 0%) with full participation (ρ = 100%).
Blocking pair rate by participation rate.
Stability Blocking pair rate by ρ.
Back